The marketization
of automobiles can be used to construct social structure and determine distribution
of wealth. Car production is heavily influenced by the intended customer since
a producer needs to develop a product that is appealing and compelling to
particular audience. A producer will not spend his resources creating a car for
someone that cannot afford it regardless. Thus explains the existence of
Coach-builders. During the Gilded Age in American History, 1870-1900,
automobiles were marketed to the upper class. Car were not sold in the manner
they are in current time. It consisted of a two step process: first the buyer selected
an automobile manufacturer to provide only the rolling chassis, comprising:
chassis, drivetrain. Then the customer would approach a coach-builder,
requesting a personal body design to be fitted on the new chassis. Initially,
the long-established and refined skills and tools. This process, being
very expensive and inefficient, made it impossible to be sold to middle and
lower class. Surprisingly, during the same time frame, the top 1% controlled
more than 20% of total income in America. Juxtaposing the mode of car
production being solely for the wealthy and the fact that the 1% controlled
most of the income available in the US in that time frame, it is evident that
marketization of automobiles relates to the inequality of wealth in given
society.
Showing posts with label SINGH. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SINGH. Show all posts
Tuesday, April 5, 2016
What Cars Say about the Gilded Age
Studying cars can provide insight into the
culture of a society. Cars became a vital component in American society since
the mid-twentieth century. By the 1940s, virtually every middle class and upper
class household had a car. Now they are an extension of cultural and artistic
values. This is the case even during the Gilded Age. The replacement of
coach-builders resulted in cars with a lack uniqueness and diversity since cars
were now not individually handcrafted and tailored to person. Cars were now
bland and mass produced. These changes mimicked the culture of the time. The
era of interchangeable parts and assembly line resulted in the devaluation of
skilled labor and overall humanity. People were now simply tools that could be
thrown in and out of factories at the disposal of the employer. In fact, this
careless disregard for human life and individuality gave rise to term “Gilded
Age,” or underlying social problems that were masked by a thin gold lucrative
plating of economic success for the 1%. The coach-builder system revealed
that the individuality and humanity was reserved for the wealthy while the rest
of society plunged into the era of mass production: working tirelessly in
factoring in poor, barely survivable conditions.
Coding and Biology
Many people don’t see coding and biology as going together.
The only instance anyone probably heard of is, DNA coding, which is not exactly
done in Java or MATLAB. But soon, you will find that these two components are
going to be intertwined. The reason is, coding aids both diagnosis and research
of medical diseases. Scientist and
Doctors can use codes to analyze a patient’s medical report quicker and cross reference
with previous cases to more efficiently treat patients. In the same way,
doctors are currently using coding constructs to study tumors and determine the
stage, drug resistance and prognosis of cancer in patients. This task is
usually extraneous and time consuming: going through each line of DNA and find
a mutation or similarity between other cancers. But codes and computer can doe
this thousands of times faster and more accurately.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)