If you have been paying
attention to current discussion of discrimination in the modern United States,
the notion of privilege should not be
alien to you. Privilege, in this
context, refers to special advantages that certain social demographics have
over each other. And you can’t deny that it exists – if you are white, you are
not as likely to be a victim of police abuse as a black person is; if you are
male, you are not as likely to be a victim of sexual assault as a female is; if
you are rich, well, you’re rich.
Some people,
particularly in arguably privileged demographics, are nevertheless gung ho on
denying this, but why so? Sometimes it is simply due to plain old bigotry.
Other times though it can be the result of an innocent ignorance – if you have
a stable upbringing and do not follow current events or else get your information
from dishonest sources, you may simply not be aware of ongoing injustice in
this country and may feel skeptical to hear people speak otherwise. More often, though, this denial is rooted in
stinginess – the concept of privilege is really not hard to understand, and any
well-informed citizen can see the evidence for it. Plenty of people would rather
not acknowledge it so they would not feel obligated to apply effort required to
remedy widespread social injustice. Frequently, however, people, out of fear or
fury, will deny the existence of privilege, associating it with the idea that
they are to blame for the injustice. This mistrust often arises from
misinformation and misunderstanding of the concept, but it is not completely
unjustified, as several of the people who push for the awareness of privilege
are instigating it themselves.
A few weeks ago, US presidential
candidate Bernie
Sanders stated that “when you’re white, you don’t know what it’s like to be
living in a ghetto,” or to be poor, or to suffer police abuse. Never mind that white
people can suffer poverty and police
abuse, and plenty of them do – they just aren’t as likely to do so as black
people are. It is important to spread awareness to certain groups that other
ones are more likely to have it bad, but to tell them that they cannot have it bad at all is not how one
gets them to listen. Nonetheless, there are even louder, more extreme voices
that will go as far as to blame the privileged for injustice, or else hold them
to higher standards by arguing that only they can cause it (not a far cry from
the White Man’s Burden of the 19th
century). In the newly rising social democratic left under Bernie Sanders, the
rich are being blamed for poverty – 1%
has become a political slur. (Not to say this country has not suffered under
abuse by wealthy elites, but being wealthy does not make one guilty of that
abuse.) White people are all blamed for racism. Men are all blamed for rape. (Not
to say that all social justice activists use this rhetoric – many do not – but the
ones
who do have a sizeable voice.)
This discussion culminated
in its worst point when the word privilege
earned a negative connotation – privilege is now being evoked, such as in the
case of affirmative action, to obligate people to “pay reparations” for
injustice. One may defend this by arguing that doing so is the only way one can
remedy the effects of injustice – this idea, however, is ultimately poisonous. Let
us not forget that being healthy, educated, academically or intellectually gifted,
or otherwise successful are privileges: and these are probably the factors on
which affirmative action defeated its own purpose – helping discriminated
minorities – by discriminating
against Asians. You might perceive this as benign, but do not fool yourself
as to how far this mentality can go – the deadliest genocides and mass murders
in the 20th centuries targeted the privileged. The Jewish people,
one of the most successful ethnic groups in the world, earned the envy of their
German neighbors until the Nazi Party seized power; the Rwandan genocide
targeted the Tutsi people, who made up the country’s historical wealthy, ruling
class; and the massacres carried out by Josef Stalin, Mao Zedong, and Pol Pot
targeted the bourgeoisie and intelligentsia.
In the end, the problem
is not that certain people have
privilege, but that certain people are deprived
of it.
No comments:
Post a Comment